The Conflict
Conflict can be defined as the disagreement between the two opinions. It can be of various types depending upon the various circumstances.
Talking about the most basic conflicts, which are psychological or mental conflict and are widely experienced by all of us.
Starting from a child who is a newbie for each kind of experience. Where its every activity is based on its own instincts and it doesn't give any second thought before taking any action. Which can also be said to as the purity of the heart, as no complex thought occurs in its mind and whatever it does, is purely the outcome of its instincts.
Growing up a little, observing its own parents the most, the thought processes are initiated. The first conflict arises, although it is based on the knowledge and experience it gains till date. Observing its parents following a certain pattern in lifestyle, the question it faces is "Why, I follow my instincts and I do this thing while my parents follow their instinct and do that thing".
Later it concludes that there were no instinct,which its parents were following but just a planned activity.
The second conflict,"why I go by instinct and they go by plan".
Finally it concludes that going by plan gives favorable outcome and now it learned to control its instincts and over-rule it by planned activity.
Although the thought processes are still simplified but the instincts of the complex thoughts are provoked.
Further growing it learns, the good and the bad. The things which are prohibited are bad while the things which are not are good.
Conflicts "why are there good and bad, why aren't there only me and whatever I wish".
It then concludes that as far as my bad deeds are unknown to others, I am good. The complexity enhances by time and with the experience of the mind.
Furthermore, in ones psychological conflict there is always the chances of winning of that thought which is being favored by you. In other words it is a biased form of decision that wins. The logic of the mind are now primary based in the social boundaries in general and healthy mind as per definition, while if there is any kind of conflicts against the social norms. It may either lead to change in social ethics or getting involvement in anti-social activities. Which in turn may increase the crime. And there is fair chance of anti-socialism because it involves only one person's mind.
Beside these, there are also some kind of conflicts that arise within the borders of the social norms but still are not accepted by the society and these kind of conflicts covers the 90% of the total youth minds.
Further growing, gives the real lesson of being human and the logic, the ethics and the society norms are justified.
The conflict between normal lifestyle and the desired lifestyle is the final conflict that remains in ones mind throughout lifetime, because either of the choice doesn't satisfies the mind and thus it keeps on challenging its own decision. While the other miscellaneous conflicts arises from the surrounding environment and are resolved now and then.
Finally the conclusion is also a kind of conflict as all of these thoughts and activities are based on ones perception, about how we see ourselves and the society and how we question the society and how we answer those questions. And all of these things are individually different. So there are chances that whatever conflict your mind initiates, its anti-conflict may have been initiated in someone else's mind.
Talking about the most basic conflicts, which are psychological or mental conflict and are widely experienced by all of us.
Starting from a child who is a newbie for each kind of experience. Where its every activity is based on its own instincts and it doesn't give any second thought before taking any action. Which can also be said to as the purity of the heart, as no complex thought occurs in its mind and whatever it does, is purely the outcome of its instincts.
Growing up a little, observing its own parents the most, the thought processes are initiated. The first conflict arises, although it is based on the knowledge and experience it gains till date. Observing its parents following a certain pattern in lifestyle, the question it faces is "Why, I follow my instincts and I do this thing while my parents follow their instinct and do that thing".
Later it concludes that there were no instinct,which its parents were following but just a planned activity.
The second conflict,"why I go by instinct and they go by plan".
Finally it concludes that going by plan gives favorable outcome and now it learned to control its instincts and over-rule it by planned activity.
Although the thought processes are still simplified but the instincts of the complex thoughts are provoked.
Further growing it learns, the good and the bad. The things which are prohibited are bad while the things which are not are good.
Conflicts "why are there good and bad, why aren't there only me and whatever I wish".
It then concludes that as far as my bad deeds are unknown to others, I am good. The complexity enhances by time and with the experience of the mind.
Furthermore, in ones psychological conflict there is always the chances of winning of that thought which is being favored by you. In other words it is a biased form of decision that wins. The logic of the mind are now primary based in the social boundaries in general and healthy mind as per definition, while if there is any kind of conflicts against the social norms. It may either lead to change in social ethics or getting involvement in anti-social activities. Which in turn may increase the crime. And there is fair chance of anti-socialism because it involves only one person's mind.
Beside these, there are also some kind of conflicts that arise within the borders of the social norms but still are not accepted by the society and these kind of conflicts covers the 90% of the total youth minds.
Further growing, gives the real lesson of being human and the logic, the ethics and the society norms are justified.
The conflict between normal lifestyle and the desired lifestyle is the final conflict that remains in ones mind throughout lifetime, because either of the choice doesn't satisfies the mind and thus it keeps on challenging its own decision. While the other miscellaneous conflicts arises from the surrounding environment and are resolved now and then.
Finally the conclusion is also a kind of conflict as all of these thoughts and activities are based on ones perception, about how we see ourselves and the society and how we question the society and how we answer those questions. And all of these things are individually different. So there are chances that whatever conflict your mind initiates, its anti-conflict may have been initiated in someone else's mind.
Comments
Post a Comment